What Is the STRIDE Threat Model?

Recent high-profile security breaches have shown that reactive security measures aren't enough. Proper threat modeling might have prevented some of these breaches. The STRIDE threat model, developed by Microsoft, has emerged as one of the most effective frameworks for proactive security planning. The acronym STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service (DoS), and Elevation of Privilege) is a systematic approach to security that helps development teams think like attackers to protect their systems before breaches occur.

The 6 Categories of STRIDE

The STRIDE model categorizes threats into six types, each addressing a different aspect of software security risks:

• Spoofing: Think of spoofing as digital identity theft. It refers to impersonating another user or system component to gain unauthorized access. Spoofing attacks compromise authentication mechanisms, allowing attackers to masquerade as legitimate users or devices.

• Tampering: Tampering is the unauthorized alteration of data or code. Such attacks can compromise data integrity by modifying files, databases, software code, deployment pipelines, or memory in running applications. Tampering poses serious risks in every system, particularly those where data accuracy is crucial for decision-making.

• Repudiation: Repudiation threats exploit gaps in accountability. This type of security threat occurs when a user or system denies performing a certain action, such as a transaction. This threat exploits a lack of non-repudiation controls in software systems, making it difficult to hold parties accountable for their actions.

• Information Disclosure: This refers to the unintended exposure of confidential or sensitive information to unauthorized parties. It can result from inadequate encryption, improper access controls, or vulnerabilities in web applications.

• Denial of Service (DoS): This category of security threats aims to disrupt the availability of services by overwhelming the system with excessive requests or exploiting system vulnerabilities. DoS attacks make systems unavailable to legitimate users and cause business disruptions.

• Elevation of Privilege: This occurs when an attacker gains higher-level access than intended, often by exploiting a system vulnerability. This can lead to administrative-level control over a system, allowing the attacker to install malicious software, modify system configurations, or access sensitive data.

Spoofing

Spoofing is the act of impersonating another device or user to deceive systems or individuals. This can involve falsifying identity information, such as IP addresses or email headers. The threat posed by spoofing is significant, as it can lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, and manipulation of information. When attackers successfully spoof identities, they can easily bypass security measures designed to protect sensitive systems. Common examples of spoofing attacks include email spoofing, where attackers send messages that appear to come from a trusted source, and IP spoofing, which can enable malicious users to evade detection. The potential impact of these attacks can range from financial loss and reputational damage to compromised personal data.

Tampering

Tampering refers to the unauthorized alteration of data or system configurations, which can include changing files, modifying software code, or interfering with data in transit. This act undermines the integrity of software systems, introducing incorrect or malicious data that can lead to erroneous system behavior or decisions. Such alterations erode user trust and can violate compliance regulations. An example of tampering is when an attacker alters the content of a software update or manipulates transaction records in a database. The repercussions of these attacks can be severe, resulting in financial losses, legal consequences, and significant damage to a brand's reputation.

Repudiation

In cybersecurity, repudiation describes the ability of a user to deny having performed an action within a system, often due to a lack of reliable evidence or logs. This presents challenges for accountability and non-repudiation, making it difficult to trace actions back to users.  Repudiation can be particularly problematic in e-commerce, financial, or legal systems, where transaction logs must be reliable. For instance, when a user claims they did not authorize a transaction, the absence of sufficient logging can hinder investigations and enforcement of security policies. The impact of such repudiation attacks can lead to disputes over transactions, increased opportunities for fraud, and weakened security protocols, all of which can compromise the overall integrity of a system.

Information Disclosure

Information disclosure involves the unauthorized access or exposure of sensitive data to individuals or entities not intended to receive it. This unauthorized access poses a serious threat, as it can lead to identity theft, corporate espionage, and violations of privacy regulations. The confidentiality of data is compromised, which can have lasting repercussions for both individuals and organizations. Information disclosure is often manifested in side-channel attacks in microservices, cloud misconfiguration exposures, API information leakage, and cache timing attacks. Common targets of information disclosure include personal data, trade secrets, and intellectual property, which can lead to regulatory fines and reputational damage.

Examples of information disclosure attacks include data breaches that result in sensitive customer information being leaked, or misconfigured cloud storage that exposes private data. The potential impacts are significant, encompassing financial losses, legal liabilities, and a devastating blow to consumer trust.

Denial of Service

Denial of Service (DoS) refers to an attack aimed at making a service unavailable to its intended users by overwhelming it with traffic or exploiting vulnerabilities. Such attacks disrupt the availability of software systems, rendering them inaccessible to legitimate users. The consequences can include downtime, revenue loss, and damage to an organization’s reputation. A common example of a DoS attack is a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack, where multiple systems flood a target server with traffic. The impact of these attacks can be substantial, leading to operational disruptions and significant financial costs that may take considerable time to recover from.

Elevation of Privilege

Elevation of privilege describes a security vulnerability that allows a user to gain unauthorized access to higher-level functions or data within a system. This type of access poses a serious threat, enabling attackers to manipulate sensitive data, execute administrative commands, or compromise system integrity. For example, an elevation of privilege attack might involve exploiting software vulnerabilities to gain admin rights or employing social engineering tactics to trick users into granting elevated access. The potential impact of such attacks can be profound, leading to data breaches, system corruption, and extensive damage to organizational security, making it essential for organizations to prioritize effective security measures.

Implementing STRIDE

We can broadly classify the implementation of threat modeling with STRIDE in the following phases:

Phase 1: System Decomposition

Break down the software architecture into distinct components, such as servers, databases, APIs, and user interfaces. This helps in pinpointing the entry points and assets that threats may target.

1. Create a data flow diagram (DFD) of your system.
2. Identify trust boundaries.
3. Map out system components and their interactions.
4. Document authentication and authorization points.

Phase 2: Threat Analysis

For each identified component, analyze potential threats based on the STRIDE categories. For example, examine whether authentication mechanisms are vulnerable to spoofing or if data storage methods might be susceptible to tampering.

For each component:

1. Apply STRIDE categories.
2. Use threat trees to identify attack vectors.
3. Consider business impact.
4. Document assumptions and dependencies.

Phase 3: Mitigation Planning

For each threat, develop corresponding security controls. Techniques may include enforcing strong authentication to prevent spoofing, using digital signatures to protect against tampering, or implementing rate-limiting to guard against DoS attacks.

Create a mitigation strategy that includes the following:

1. Technical controls
2. Procedural safeguards
3. Monitoring requirements
4. Incident response procedures

Modern Tools for STRIDE Implementation

Commercial Tools

• Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool: This tool allows users to create visual representations of software systems and identify threats based on the STRIDE framework.
• IriusRisk: This tool offers automated threat modeling and risk assessment capabilities, enabling integration with existing development workflows.
• ThreatModeler: This cloud-native threat modeling tool facilitates the identification and assessment of security threats in architectural designs, enabling collaboration and integration within development processes.

Open Source Alternatives

• OWASP Threat Dragon: This open source threat modeling tool supports diagramming software architecture and assessing security threats.
• PyTM: This Python-based framework for threat modeling allows users to define systems and their potential threats programmatically, making it easy to automate and integrate into existing development workflows.
• ThreatSpec: This infrastructure-as-code threat modeling tool enhances security by allowing users to define and analyze security risks directly within their code, streamlining the identification of vulnerabilities in cloud and on-premises environments.

Benefits of Using the STRIDE Threat Model

In the banking sector, the STRIDE model is employed to identify potential threats to online banking applications. By categorizing threats such as spoofing and information disclosure, banks can implement measures like multi-factor authentication and encryption to safeguard customer data. Similarly, in the healthcare industry, hospitals utilize the STRIDE framework to protect patient information stored in electronic health records (EHRs). This threat modeling helps secure data transmission channels and ensures that only authorized personnel can access sensitive information. Cloud service providers also leverage STRIDE to assess threats in multi-tenant environments, identifying risks such as tampering and elevation of privilege. By doing so, they can implement strict access controls and encryption to isolate customer data effectively.

The STRIDE threat model provides several advantages for software development and cybersecurity, such as:

• Proactive security: Identifying threats early in the SDLC allows for the integration of security measures before deployment, reducing the likelihood of vulnerabilities being exploited in production.
• Comprehensive risk assessment: The six threat categories cover various aspects of security, ensuring a holistic evaluation of the software's security posture.
• Enhanced security awareness: By using STRIDE, development teams gain a deeper understanding of potential risks, fostering a security-focused culture within the organization.
• Cost-effective mitigation: Addressing security issues during the design phase is typically less expensive than fixing vulnerabilities post-deployment. STRIDE enables organizations to implement effective countermeasures early, saving time and resources.
• Improved regulatory compliance: For industries that require strict adherence to data protection laws and standards (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA), using STRIDE can help demonstrate a commitment to security and risk management.

Conclusion

Threat modeling, a subset of threat detection, helps security teams keep up with the increasing quantity and sophistication of attacks. As systems become more complex and threats more sophisticated, STRIDE's structured approach becomes increasingly valuable. Organizations must adapt their implementation of STRIDE to address emerging threats while maintaining its core principles of systematic threat identification and mitigation. By understanding and properly implementing STRIDE, organizations can better protect their assets, maintain customer trust, and ensure business continuity in an increasingly hostile digital landscape.

Through its Evergreen® architecture, Pure Storage offers security-first computing and storage solutions with ActiveDR™, ActiveCluster™, and SafeMode™ Snapshots, to name a few. These solutions help in the proper implementation of security frameworks like STRIDE, providing the underlying technology to ensure that the practices defined by the model are effective and successful.